Publié : 2 February 2026
Actualisé : 3 hours ago
Fiabilité : ✓ Sources vérifiées
Je mets à jour cet article dès que de nouvelles informations sont disponibles.
📋 Table of Contents
The Great Shift in General Sentiment
Just two years ago, in 2024, this same technology was met with cautious optimism, with only 18% of developers expressing an unfavorable opinion. The following year, in 2025, that figure climbed to 30%. Today, in 2026, we cross the symbolic threshold of an absolute majority. The camp of enthusiasts, meanwhile, has shrunk significantly: only 7% of respondents find AI to have a positive impact, compared to 21% twenty-four months ago. It seems everyone has finally understood the hidden rule of the game: the house always wins. It’s brutal. It’s like going from insane hype to a collective hangover.
⏪ Before (2024)
18% of video game professionals viewed AI unfavorably. Optimism predominated, with promises of autonomous NPCs and infinite worlds fueling dreams. AI was the new tech star to unbox.
⏩ After (2026)
52% of professionals deem AI’s impact negative. A genuine turnaround, where mistrust replaces excitement, and ethical and professional concerns override the thirst for innovation.
A Puzzling Paradox: Rising Use, Dwindling Morale
But wait, there’s more. The kicker is that this widespread distrust doesn’t translate into a decrease in usage. Quite the opposite! 52% of studios claim to be leveraging generative AI. Clearly, this technology is becoming embedded in daily workflows, even if teams eye it with skepticism. This is where it gets intriguing. We’re not talking about AI crafting complex storylines or generating entire open worlds while humans sip their coffee. No, the usage is far more prosaic, more down-to-earth.
✅ Accepted Uses (Productivity)
⚠️ Rejected Uses (Creation)
The Creative Divide and Reasons for a Resounding ‘No’
This divergence of opinion creates a real fracture within studios, much like a good crisis management game where factions clash. Who is driving this rejection? Primarily creatives. Visual arts professionals (64% negative opinions) and narrative designers (63% negative opinions) are the most vocal. On the other hand, Business Developers and executive management (around 19% positive opinions) are more accommodating. For them, efficiency takes precedence. It’s an undeniable logic: the more a profession touches the artistic essence, the emotion of a game, the more this technology is perceived as an existential threat.
“I would rather leave the industry than use generative AI.”
And this isn’t merely technophobia. The arguments are solid and raise clear concerns. First, data ethics: where do the datasets of images, texts, or sounds that feed these algorithms come from? Often, they are the work of artists, used without their consent or compensation. That’s chilling for many. Second, ecology: generating a simple illustration can consume as much energy as a smartphone charge. Imagine that on the scale of a studio like Ubisoft or a startup like Voodoo, which produces thousands of assets! The carbon footprint would make a crypto mining farm green with envy. Finally, job displacement concerns: Marc, the CEO, worries for his teams, but Alex the dev and Sophie the product manager are even more concerned about their own futures. The idea of a great digital replacement, where machines take over creative tasks from humans, sends shivers down the spine. This kind of apprehension is not new in the history of technology. In the 19th century, the advent of photography shook painters, who feared their art would disappear. Ultimately, photography opened new creative perspectives, and painting evolved. AI could follow a similar path, but the transition promises to be turbulent. Specifically, for independent studios, this evolution could mean reduced production costs, a significant advantage. However, the risk of dehumanizing works and losing artistic identity is real. For industry giants, it’s a balance between efficiency and community acceptance. Ultimately, the debate is far from over. This confrontation raises a crucial question: how will the video game industry navigate between AI’s potential for productivity and the preservation of the creative soul that resonates with players? The dialogue is open. And you, what place would you give AI in the design of your ideal game?
Frequently Asked Questions
How has the perception of generative AI changed among game developers?
Are game development studios currently using generative AI, despite negative opinions?
What are game developers’ primary concerns regarding generative AI?
For what specific tasks are game studios commonly using generative AI?
About the author: Fascinated by the technologies of tomorrow, I'm Mickaël Rigaud, your guide to the world of Artificial Intelligence. On my website, iactualite.info, I decipher the innovations shaping our future. Join me to explore the latest AI trends!
0 Comments