Publié : 11 December 2025
Actualisé : 4 hours ago
Fiabilité : ✓ Sources vérifiées
Je mets à jour cet article dès que de nouvelles informations sont disponibles.
📋 Table of Contents
TIME Magazine’s selection of “AI architects” as Person of the Year 2025 cost Polymarket bettors dearly. Wagers on “artificial intelligence” itself resulted in a $7 million loss, highlighting the pitfalls of predictive betting platforms.
🤖 The Rise of AI Builders
Each year, TIME Magazine’s Person of the Year announcement is a major event. In 2025, the magazine chose to highlight those shaping the artificial intelligence landscape: “AI architects.” Honored figures include Sam Altman of OpenAI, Jensen Huang of Nvidia, and Demis Hassabis of Google. A bold choice reflecting AI’s growing importance in society.
This distinction, started in 1927, has recognized diverse figures like Charles Lindbergh, Pope Francis, Barack Obama, and, more recently, Volodymyr Zelensky. TIME sometimes rewards concepts, such as “the computer” in 1982. This year, the magazine chose to spotlight key players in AI development.
💸 Polymarket: When Bets Go Sour
While TIME’s decision was praised by many, it stirred up trouble on the Polymarket predictive betting platform. Gamblers had bet heavily that “artificial intelligence” would be named Person of the Year. However, TIME chose a more literal interpretation, rewarding individuals who design and develop these systems. Result: a $7 million loss for those who didn’t anticipate this subtlety.
This financial fiasco highlights a crucial problem: the lack of clarity and precision in the rules of predictive betting platforms. The ambiguity of the term “artificial intelligence” allowed TIME to justify its choice, leaving gamblers out in the cold. This raises questions about the fairness and transparency of these platforms.
⚠️ Pitfalls of Predictive Platforms
The Polymarket affair reveals the inherent risks in predictive betting platforms. These sites, which allow betting on future events, are often presented as reliable prediction tools. However, they can also be manipulated or biased by implicit rules favoring wealthy investors over small bettors.
In this case, TIME’s restrictive interpretation of “artificial intelligence” benefited those who could bet on a more precise definition. Less savvy bettors, who bet on a broader definition, were penalized. A bitter lesson for those who thought they could predict the future.
🤔 Should We Blame AI or the Bettors?
So, who is responsible for this fiasco? Is it AI, which has evolved so rapidly that even the most knowledgeable bettors struggled to keep up? Or is it the predictive betting platforms, which lack clarity and transparency? The answer is probably a bit of both.
It is clear that the rise of AI has created new betting opportunities, but it has also complicated the game. Bettors must now not only anticipate the future but also understand the nuances and subtleties of this constantly evolving technology. As for the betting platforms, they must redouble their efforts to ensure the fairness and transparency of their rules.
Key Point: TIME’s naming of “AI Architects” as Person of the Year highlighted the risks and ambiguities of predictive betting platforms, leading to massive losses for some bettors.
❔ Frequently Asked Questions
Why did people lose so much money on Polymarket?
0 Comments