Publié : 23 November 2025
Actualisé : 2 hours ago
Fiabilité : ✓ Sources vérifiées
Je mets à jour cet article dès que de nouvelles informations sont disponibles.
📋 Table of Contents
The tech world feels a bit like the Wild West right now. Between the AI cowboys promising the moon and the purist sheriffs shooting on sight, it’s hard to get your bearings. And then, amidst all the noise, Linus Torvalds, the father of Linux, steps in. With his legendary bluntness, he just set the record straight on artificial intelligence and the famous “vibe coding.”
🎙️ Linus Torvalds: Pragmatism First and Foremost
At the recent Open Source Summit in Seoul, Linus didn’t mince words. Forget the apocalyptic prophecies or the blissful optimism. His take on generative AI? It’s “just another tool.” And frankly, it’s refreshing to hear such a down-to-earth voice in this often hysterical debate.
While some are already imagining themselves as “prompt engineers” and others are declaring AI to be absolute evil, Linus offers a nuanced, common-sense perspective. He’s neither a guru nor a reactionary; just a developer with decades of experience.
💡 What Exactly is “Vibe Coding”?
For those who haven’t caught up with the latest trend, “vibe coding” is a term coined by Andrej Karpathy of OpenAI. The idea is simple: you describe to a large language model (LLM) what you want to code. The AI then generates the code, you test it, and you ask for adjustments. It’s a rapid, intuitive feedback loop.
On paper, it’s appealing, right? It opens doors for those who aren’t seasoned coders and speeds up prototyping for others. But as always with powerful tools, the devil is in the details.
⚖️ Linus’s Verdict: A Double-Edged Sword
Linus himself says he’s “rather positive” about vibe coding. He sees its potential, especially as an excellent entry point for programming beginners or for small projects and rapid prototypes. It allows people who don’t know how to code to create amazing things.
However, there’s a huge “but.” For critical code, the kind that runs in production and must be absolutely reliable, Linus is emphatic: maintaining such AI-generated code is likely to be “horrible, horrible.” It’s hard to disagree with him when you know the demands of the real world.
The key takeaway: Linus Torvalds endorses “vibe coding” for learning and prototyping, but deems it “horrible” for maintaining critical code in production.
🤖 Bugs, Bots, and Bottlenecks: The Other Side of the Coin
Linus doesn’t personally use AI for coding. But he observes others attempting to integrate AI-generated code into the Linux kernel. And this raises concrete problems. Kernel maintainers are already swamped with bogus bug reports and security notices, often generated by users who misuse AI.
That’s not all. The AI crawlers relentlessly scraping code from kernel.org to feed their models are putting a significant strain on the servers. Yes, even the robust infrastructure of the Linux project suffers from the onslaught of greedy bots.
| “Vibe Coding” Benefits (per Linus) | Drawbacks (per Linus) |
|---|---|
| Excellent entry point for beginners | “Horrible” maintenance for critical code |
| Rapid and efficient prototyping | Generation of erroneous bug/security reports |
| Increases individual productivity | Server overload from AI crawlers |
| Enables non-experts to create | Lack of deep understanding of generated code |
🕰️ An Echo from the Past: AI Like Compilers?
Linus, with his seasoned wisdom, loves historical comparisons. He reminds us that the current hysteria around AI is not unprecedented. He vividly recalls the heated debates surrounding the advent of compilers.
At the time, purists feared these tools would “kill” the programming profession. The outcome? Compilers revolutionized development, making developers more productive, improving security, and allowing for the creation of systems of unparalleled complexity. AI, he says, is “EXACTLY THE SAME.”
Linus has some historical baggage. For example, he remembers the same kind of debates when compilers arrived. Back then, there were code-pissing purists who screamed it would kill the ‘programmer’ profession, when ultimately, it just increased productivity, security, and allowed for more complex things to be done.
🚀 Navigating the AI Era Wisely
No, AI won’t replace developers, at least not anytime soon. It will change how they work, making them more efficient and capable of achieving more ambitious things. It’s a powerful new tool in the developer’s toolbox, nothing more, nothing less.
Important: Using AI-generated code demands a complete understanding of what it does. Without careful review, you won’t be able to debug it, maintain it, or secure it effectively in the long run. Don’t trust blindly!
So, yes, “vibe coding” is an exciting innovation. But as with anything, the key is intelligence, responsibility, and a good dose of discernment. Thank you, Linus, for this essential reminder in the age of hyper-hype!
❔ Frequently Asked Questions
What is the 'Vibe Coding' mentioned in the article?
0 Comments